No. 3: Super Bowl XX: Chicago 46, New England 10

Although many Chicagoans have kept their VCRs so they could re-enjoy this dominant performance over and over, this was not competitive despite the <a class="taxInlineTagLink" id="ORSPT000192" title="New England Patriots" href="/topic/sports/football/new-england-patriots-ORSPT000192.topic">Patriots</a> grabbing the quickest lead in <a class="taxInlineTagLink" id="EVSPR000004" title="Super Bowl" href="/topic/sports/football/super-bowl-EVSPR000004.topic">Super Bowl</a> history (3-0 with 1:19 elapsed). The Bears rebounded for a 23-3 first-half lead as they outgained New England 236 yards to negative-19.The Bears went on to tie the Super Bowl record for sacks (seven) and held New England to a record-low seven rushing yards.

lat-worstno_3_dm6179gw

( Otto Greule / Allsport )

Although many Chicagoans have kept their VCRs so they could re-enjoy this dominant performance over and over, this was not competitive despite the Patriots grabbing the quickest lead in Super Bowl history (3-0 with 1:19 elapsed). The Bears rebounded for a 23-3 first-half lead as they outgained New England 236 yards to negative-19.The Bears went on to tie the Super Bowl record for sacks (seven) and held New England to a record-low seven rushing yards.

Comments (0)

Add comments | Discussion FAQ

Currently there are no comments. Be the first to comment!

COMMENTING POLICY: Readers are encouraged to post comments that are germane to the article. We reserve the right to remove any user, and to delete comments that contain abusive language or personal threats, as well as those that are racist or demeaning. Readers may report comments by clicking "Report Abuse." Once a comment has been flagged, a Baltimore Sun staffer will investigate. Click here for more information on commenting.