Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.

'Pattern' of problems seen in GM cars, but regulators declined to act

Product RecallsAuto TrendsGeneral MotorsAutomotive EquipmentManufacturing and EngineeringNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration

WASHINGTON — Federal regulators twice declined to investigate faulty ignition switches in General Motors Co. cars that led to 13 deaths — even though one official found "a pattern" of problems, according to a new congressional report.

The report, released Sunday, added fresh details to a controversy that has shaken the revitalized automaker.

Already under fire for lengthy delays in recalling the vehicles, GM also was accused in the report of allowing the defective part to be installed in millions of vehicles after testing showed it did not meet the company's own specifications.

The developments came in a 16-page report that summarized an investigation by the House Energy and Commerce Committee ahead of a high-profile hearing Tuesday.

"We now know the problems persisted over a decade, the red flags were many, and yet those responsible failed to connect the dots," said Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), the committee's chairman.

GM Chief Executive Mary Barra and David J. Friedman, the acting administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, are scheduled to testify Tuesday before the panel's Oversight and Investigations subcommittee about the reason for delays in recalling vehicles with the faulty ignition switch.

The defective switch caused vehicle engines to turn off, disabling the air bags. The part has been linked to a series of crashes and, by GM's latest disclosure Friday, at least 13 deaths in six models. The Detroit automaker has recalled more than 2.6 million vehicles globally.

"The revelation that NHTSA had teed up an investigation and deep-sixed it is very troubling," said Sean Kane, president of Safety Research & Strategies, an independent, for-profit safety research company.

NHTSA on Sunday defended its handling of the GM ignition switch problems.

"As we have stated previously, the agency reviewed data from a number of sources in 2007, but the data we had available at the time did not warrant a formal investigation," the agency said.

"Recent data presented by GM provides new information and evidence directly linking the ignition switch to the air bag non-deployment. That's why we are aggressively investigating the timing of GM's recall."

Meanwhile, a group of siblings and parents of 16 people who were killed or injured in crashes linked to the faulty switches have sent an open letter to Barra, seeking a meeting when she is in Washington.

"Now that the truth has come to light — with more head-shaking disclosures every day — you must do what's right," lawyer Bob Hilliard wrote on behalf of the families in a letter over the weekend.

"They need to hear from you, listen to your voice to know you are truly sorry and that you share in their grief and, to an extent at least, you understand their loss," he wrote.

Greg Martin, a GM spokesman, reiterated that company officials "deeply regret the circumstances that led to the recall" and would cooperate fully with NHTSA and Congress "to help get them a better understanding of the facts."

House investigators have received more than 235,000 pages of documents from GM and NHTSA as part of the investigation, and "they paint an unsettling picture," said Rep. Tim Murphy (R-Pa.), the subcommittee's chairman.

NHTSA and the Justice Department have opened investigations into why it took so long for GM to recall the vehicles. Documents filed with NHTSA indicate the company knew about the problem as early as 2001.

Kane said he wasn't surprised by the agency's failure to launch an investigation.

"NHTSA is very scattershot about what they decide to do and when they decide to do it, and they have resisted setting guidelines for when to decide to take enforcement actions," he said.

The chronology investigators put together demonstrated why the safety agency needs clearly established and transparent standards for launching probes and establishing recalls, he said.

After some crashes involving GM vehicles in which air bags did not deploy, the chief of NHTSA's Defects Assessment Division emailed other agency officials in September 2007 proposing an investigation into problems in 2003 to 06 Chevrolet Cobalts and Saturn Ions.

The email said there was "a pattern of reported non-deployments" of air bags in complaints from vehicle owners that first was observed in early 2005.

At the time, GM indicated "they see no specific problem pattern," the committee report said.

A PowerPoint presentation prepared by the Defects Assessment Division, dated Nov. 17, 2007, said its review of the problem was prompted by 29 complaints and four fatal crashes.

But NHTSA's Office of Defects Investigation declined to investigate further, the committee report said, noting that "the panel did not identify any discernible trend and decided not to pursue a more formal investigation."

In 2010, after another accident in which the air bags in a Cobalt failed to deploy, NHTSA's Office of Defects Investigation again considered whether there was a problem "but determined the data did not show a trend," the report said.

GM did not begin recalls until this February. Models recalled were the 2003 to '07 Saturn Ions, 2007 to '10 Saturn Skys, 2006 to '11 Chevrolet HHRs, 2006 to '10 Pontiac Solstices, and 2005 to '10 Chevrolet Cobalt and Pontiac G5 models.

The timeline investigators put together on the automaker showed that a 2001 pre-production report for the 2003 Saturn Ion "identified issues with the ignition switch," investigators said.

In February 2002, Delphi, which supplied the switch, submitted a part approval document to GM for it. Delphi officials told House committee investigators that GM approved the part "even though sample testing of the ignition switch torque was below the original specifications set by GM," the report said.

GM opened its own engineering inquiry in November 2004 into a complaint that a 2005 Cobalt could be "keyed off with knee while driving," the House report said.

Three months later, GM engineers met to consider whether there were problems with the ignition switch that made it easy to accidentally turn off the engine, which also would prevent the air bags from deploying.

The engineers considered changing the torque needed to turn off the ignition switch, "but were advised by the ignition switch engineer that it is 'close to impossible to modify the present ignition switch' as the switch is 'very fragile and doing any further changes will lead to mechanical and/or electrical problems,'" the report said.

The engineering manager for the Cobalt project decided to close the review with no action. The main reasons cited for the decision were that changes would take too long, that costs were too high and that none of the proposed fixes seemed to fully solve the problem, the report said.

The committee said the documents it had reviewed "do not explain the criteria for an 'acceptable business case' and how the decision was made in this case."

Despite the automaker's public apologies and recalls of 2.2 million vehicles in the U.S. to fix the ignition switches, GM legally shed responsibility for crashes before the automaker's 2009 bankruptcy and federal bailout.

In emerging from bankruptcy, GM's legal slate was wiped clean. The restructuring created a new company, which bought the assets of the old GM, but allowed it to shed its debts and legal liabilities.

jim.puzzanghera@latimes.com

jerry.hirsch@latimes.com

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
Product RecallsAuto TrendsGeneral MotorsAutomotive EquipmentManufacturing and EngineeringNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Comments
Loading