E-mail
Print
MADISON, Wis. This time last year, Galen Milchman was celebrating the election of Barack Obama to the White House, a victory he had worked for and believed would change the world.
Today, the 19-year-old pizza deliveryman is wondering what happened to the transformation he thought would have come by now.
"It's not all up to the president, I know that," he said. "But the Democrats are in control of the House and the Senate, and so we were going to get all this change. Where is it? It makes me feel very cynical."
A year after hopeful liberals and young people demanding "change" helped Obama win the White House, some of them say they are feeling somewhat deflated. The universal health care they wanted isn't looking so universal. They haven't seen dramatic action to slow climate change. Instead of dialing down the U.S. commitment to war, they're hearing talk of escalation.
Their declining enthusiasm leaves the Democratic Party with an important question: Should it try to energize its base by more firmly pushing for liberal policies or would that hamper its efforts to seize the political middle ground and win independent voters?
The question only became sharper after Tuesday's off-year elections for governor in Virginia and New Jersey, where independents, who often hold the key to victory for either party, sided heavily against the Democratic Party.
The Republican candidate for governor drew 60 percent of independents in New Jersey and 66 percent in Virginia. In the presidential election last year, Obama had won both states.
The conundrum for Democrats is especially obvious here, the liberal bastion around the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where Obama chose to mark the one-year anniversary of his election Wednesday with an appearance.
On campus described by one Wisconsin politician as an isthmus of liberalism surrounded by reality students and other young voters said they see a dwindling of enthusiasm.
Will Bradley, a senior in Spanish and economics, said he likes much of what he says is Obama's pragmatic, methodical approach to passing his agenda. But, Bradley said, "he does need to come through on what he promised."
Milchman, who moved to Madison from Vermont this year, said he doesn't feel angry about the lack of change, just disappointed by it. "I'm just not that impressed by how things are going," he said. "It's not that I would go vote for some other party. It's just that I feel disheartened about the whole thing."
That speaks to the potential threat for Democrats, said Charles Franklin, political scientist and pollster at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Obama won in 2008 by turning out young and minority voters, and a drop-off in enthusiasm is a problem if it means a drop-off in their motivation to vote.
"When you take them out, you're going back to lower turnout levels in the groups that were key to putting Obama over the top," Franklin said.
(c) 2009, Tribune Co.
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
PHOTOS (from MCT Photo Service, 202-383-6099): OBAMA-EDUCATION
Today, the 19-year-old pizza deliveryman is wondering what happened to the transformation he thought would have come by now.
"It's not all up to the president, I know that," he said. "But the Democrats are in control of the House and the Senate, and so we were going to get all this change. Where is it? It makes me feel very cynical."
A year after hopeful liberals and young people demanding "change" helped Obama win the White House, some of them say they are feeling somewhat deflated. The universal health care they wanted isn't looking so universal. They haven't seen dramatic action to slow climate change. Instead of dialing down the U.S. commitment to war, they're hearing talk of escalation.
Their declining enthusiasm leaves the Democratic Party with an important question: Should it try to energize its base by more firmly pushing for liberal policies or would that hamper its efforts to seize the political middle ground and win independent voters?
The question only became sharper after Tuesday's off-year elections for governor in Virginia and New Jersey, where independents, who often hold the key to victory for either party, sided heavily against the Democratic Party.
The Republican candidate for governor drew 60 percent of independents in New Jersey and 66 percent in Virginia. In the presidential election last year, Obama had won both states.
The conundrum for Democrats is especially obvious here, the liberal bastion around the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where Obama chose to mark the one-year anniversary of his election Wednesday with an appearance.
On campus described by one Wisconsin politician as an isthmus of liberalism surrounded by reality students and other young voters said they see a dwindling of enthusiasm.
Will Bradley, a senior in Spanish and economics, said he likes much of what he says is Obama's pragmatic, methodical approach to passing his agenda. But, Bradley said, "he does need to come through on what he promised."
Milchman, who moved to Madison from Vermont this year, said he doesn't feel angry about the lack of change, just disappointed by it. "I'm just not that impressed by how things are going," he said. "It's not that I would go vote for some other party. It's just that I feel disheartened about the whole thing."
That speaks to the potential threat for Democrats, said Charles Franklin, political scientist and pollster at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Obama won in 2008 by turning out young and minority voters, and a drop-off in enthusiasm is a problem if it means a drop-off in their motivation to vote.
"When you take them out, you're going back to lower turnout levels in the groups that were key to putting Obama over the top," Franklin said.
(c) 2009, Tribune Co.
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
PHOTOS (from MCT Photo Service, 202-383-6099): OBAMA-EDUCATION
Digg
Twitter
Facebook
StumbleUpon
1. Obama must send more troops to the Afghan border because we simply cannot leave a leaderless nuclear power (Pakistan) to the whims of terrorists.
2. The fastest way to fix unemployment is to pass healthcare for 40 million uninsured. The fully employed Doctors and nurses would suddenly need a half million lesser skilled support staff which many of today's unemployed would qualify for.
3. Your premiums have been going up double digits a year for at least ten years. This last year, they only went up single digits.
4. The stimulus was sloppy but necessary to back fill a $2.5 trillion dollar drop in GDP, otherwise unemployment would be higher today and much higher a year from now. (That GDP drop is a quarter of ALL economic activity in the US.) "The government should live within its means" is an idiotic statement. It's the government's job to protect tax payers from catastrophic losses and then fund those with new taxes in up years. It is private sector's job to create jobs in the up years since they clearly won't hire in a recession no matter how many tax cuts they get.
5. "The soft bigotry of low expectations" [Bush] needs to be reversed in our public schools. Obama is putting teeth in to this statement - by tying teacher performance to test scores using $5B awarded by Congress as part of stimulus. The grant should have been $50B!
PLEASE become an informed Citizen.
hopeful08 (11/05/2009, 2:08 PM )