Several Havre de Grace landlords complained about the introduction of a bill Monday that would create a new code for rental properties, including requiring owners of rental properties to get an annual rental housing license per rental unit.

Mayor Wayne Dougherty noted a public hearing had not been held yet, but six property owners nevertheless criticized the new code because it would put more of a burden on landlords.

Council members Jim Miller and Barbara Wagner ultimately voted against introducing the bill.

The council decided to schedule a public hearing on the issue for the city's next meeting on Nov. 21 and a public work session for Nov. 28.


"Like" exploreharford's Facebook page

Council President Bill Martin explained on March 21, the previous ordinance was suspended for eight months because it did not seem to be working that well.

"If things aren't working, I'm the first one to say let's go back, revisit and change," he said. "I, too, am a landlord. I own some property, a townhome in Perryville. Perryville adopted a similar ordinance in 2009."

Martin said he contacted another landlord after a tenant adjacent to his rental property had problems with the neighbor.

"I was able to keep my renter," he said. "One of the greatest benefits of this ordinance is it protects the property owner."

Also, he said, "this is a complaint-driven ordinance. We're not going to come and inspect your house."

He also said it is not a revenue ordinance, although it may seem like it.

"If the city was interested in revenue, we would not have cut taxes for seven years in a row," he said.

Councilman Fred Cullum said he looked forward to the hearing and hopes everyone reads the ordinance more carefully.

"I think what this proposed ordinance does," Cullum said, adding it frees landlords from the requirement landlords notify the city each time a new tenant moves in.

"There are a lot of things I think that make it a lot better and a lot simpler," he said.

Cullum said there is a big change in the proposed fine schedule, noting the existing code has fees that are "astronomical."

"Why anyone would want to keep that is beyond me," he said.

Councilman John Correri said some points and concerns have been raised here, and wanted to see a work session on a separate evening so some of the issues can be addressed.

"I do have some questions about things that were raised here tonight," he said.

Councilman Jim Miller disagreed, saying he does think the new ordinance will require a new city employee.

"We're not going to be able to do anything else unless we hire another body, and I'm not in favor of hiring another body to do this kind of work," he said.