Voters in Harford County will have more decisions to make come November other than whom to elect for President and to represent the First and Second congressional districts.
A recent event at Harford Community College sponsored by the League of Women Voters of Harford County, the Harford County Branch of the American Association of University Women and the Political Awareness Association of Harford Community College, Know Your Vote offered residents a look at the seven state ballot questions voters will face Nov. 6.
"These are questions that have originated in the [Maryland] General Assembly," explained Dr. Stephanie Hallock, associate professor of political science at HCC, at the Sept. 27 forum. "Now it's going to the voters to answer the issue."
The three most heated questions that night were, not surprisingly, the "Dream Act," same sex marriage and Question 7, which, if passed, would give casinos throughout the state table games and put a casino in Prince George's County.
If approved by a majority voters, Question 4 would establish that "individuals, including undocumented immigrants, are eligible to pay in-state tuition rates at community colleges in Maryland, provided the student meets certain conditions relating to attendance and graduation from a Maryland high school, filing of income taxes, intent to apply for permanent residency and registration with the selective service system (if required)."
It would also include eligibility to pay in-state tuition rates at a four-year public college or university, again, if the student meets certain criteria.
Abingdon resident Vicki Seitzinger asked Hallock if the law would mean that the parent or guardian of the student in question would only have to file their income tax return, but not necessarily pay it.
"It's an important distinction to have," she said.
Hallock responded that Seitzinger's question was better suited for an attorney, but the ballot language specifies filing the tax return.
Same sex marriage
The civil marriage protection act, if passed, would stipulate that "Maryland's civil marriage laws allow gay and lesbian couples to obtain a civil marriage license, provided they are not otherwise prohibited from marrying; protects clergy from having to perform any particular marriage ceremony in violation of their religious belief; affirms that each religious faith has exclusive control over its own theological doctrine regarding who may marry within that faith; and provides that religious organizations and certain related entities are not required to provide goods, services or benefits to an individual related to the celebration of promotion of marriage in violation of their religious beliefs."
Basically, Hallock said, "religious entities retain exclusive control over their faith, teachings and doctrines" and won't be required to marry anyone they don't want to marry.
Seitzinger said she felt the wording of "certain related entities" was "fairly vague" and asked what all that entailed.
Hallock said it was organizations tied to a religion, so most likely a hospital or school, for instance.
If a religious justice of the peace were in a position to marry a couple he or she didn't approve the union of, Seitzinger asked, would the justice have to conduct the ceremony or face legal consequences?
Harford County State Sen. Jacobs said she was on a legislative committee that heard this particular legislation and it was said that if a facility that holds receptions, a justice of the peace or court commissioner refuses to do so for a same-sex couple, those entities can be fined for doing so. Jacobs attended the forum as a candidate for the Second Congressional District.
Question 7, if approved, would expand commercial gaming in the state by authorizing table games, increasing the maximum number of video lottery terminals and allowing a sixth casino in Prince George's County.
The ballot language states the primary purpose of the expansion is to raise revenue for education.