Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. $12 for 12 weeks.

Speed cameras more about money than safety along Catonsville street

I agree with Rolling Road residents and Councilman Tom Quirk ("Speeders slow to change behavior despite cameras," Catonsville Times, Dec. 7) that speeding on Rolling Road is a problem that needs solving.

However, in these hard economic times does anyone believe that fining drivers, mostly other Catonsville residents driving to or from work, nearly $40,000 in 10 days is the way to go about it?

I drive by the speed camera twice a day. I have not received a warning or fine, so I am not grinding a personal ax.

For a fraction of $40,000, more conspicuous and forceful warning signs reminding drivers that the speed limit is photo enforced could be installed. The current warning signs are small and easily overlooked.

This would be more effective at reminding frequent users of this route and warning those who rarely use it that speeding will not be tolerated.

Keep the camera but make the signs bigger. Not doing so strongly suggests that the county is more interested in generating revenue than controlling speeders.

Scott Appelbaum

Catonsville

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Cameras and corruption
    Cameras and corruption

    I have followed The Sun's investigation of Baltimore's speed and red light cameras from the beginning and believe a desire for a back door tax is what is driving Baltimore's concern and not protecting the poor innocent school children they claim when defending the constitutionality of such laws...

  • Safety or revenue?
    Safety or revenue?

    Before it was shut down over reports of widespread errors, Baltimore ran by far the largest speed camera program in the state and one of the largest in the nation. It generated a lot of tickets and a lot of revenue for the city — so much so that officials were fighting over what to do...

Comments
Loading