As I have said earlier, I believe the pilot for Aaron Sorkin's "The Newsroom" is one of the decade's best productions. I love this series for the way it calls out the press for having lost its sense of purpose.
But the press doesn't like be called out that way, and you can see that in some of the reviews attacking Sunday's pilot for being sanctimonious and self-righteous. I love the righteousness of this series -- self or not.
But there are some reviews out there that I don't respect so much, like the one Jake Tapper did for The New Republic, which I see many bloggers citing. I like Tapper's work for ABC News, and I have said so more than once. But when the hell did he became a great TV critic? And has our profession fallen on such hard times that we have to look to the likes of Tapper for guidance?
A more important question: What did you think of Sunday's pilot? And will you be back for more? I saw four episodes, and I am onboard for this ride.
Aaron Sorkin's 'The Newsroom' speaks truth to a press that lost its way
But the press doesn't like being talked to that way
« Previous Story More Z on TV | Television critic David Zurawik of The Baltimore Sun writes about the business and culture of TV Next Story »
We've upgraded our reader commenting system. Learn more about the new features.
The Baltimore Sun encourages civil dialogue related to our stories; you must register and log-in to our site in order to participate. We reserve the right to remove any user and to delete comments that violate our Terms of Service. By commenting, you agree to these terms. Please flag inappropriate comments.