Based on Monday-night Nielsen ratings, the controversy surrounding Bill O’Reilly’s accounts of his reporting during the Falklands conflict in 1982 does not appear to be having a negative effect on his audience.
On the contrary, his ratings for Monday were up week to week and year to year with him reaching an audience of 3.3 million viewers and 568,000 in the key demographic of 25 to 54 years of age.
That is an increase of 12 percent in total viewers, and 15 percent in the demo compared to Monday of the week before, Feb. 16.
Compared to the year before, O’Reilly’s Monday-night ratings show him to be up 9 percent in total viewers and 19 percent in the key demographic.
It was O’Reilly’s largest total audience since Nov. 25, 2014, in the wake of a verdict being announced in the Ferguson (Mo.) case of a white police officer shooting an unarmed African-American teenager.
O’Reilly has been No. 1 in total viewers in cable news for 160 months.
Fox News finished No. 1 in prime time among all...Read more
If you haven't seen "Ctizenfour" in a theater, here's why I think you should move heaven and earth to see it tonight at 9 on HBO.
The Oscar it won Sunday for best documentary was just icing on the cake. It was already widely celebrated since its release in theaters, winning honors from numerous film critics groups.
There's no question of its quality; it's another extraordinary work of documentary filmmaking by Laura Poitras ("My Country, My Country").
But here's why it really matters now. Today.
The administration of President Barack Obama, which has authorized unprecedented intrusions into our privacy and used every bit of the massive power at its disposal to silence anyone in government who would question its actions, has tried to brand Edward Snowden as a traitor.
He has become the Obama administration's Public Enemy No. 1, and it has used the techniques of pure propaganda to vilify him.
What recourse would any whistleblower have against such forces?
Well, in this case, Snowden...Read more
Former CBS News correspondent Eric Engberg followed his blistering Facebook post on Saturday about Bill O'Reilly with an appearance Sunday on CNN's "Reliable Sources."
O'Reilly came under fire Thursday in a story in "Mother Jones" that claimed he exaggerated his wartime reporting in the Falklands much like suspended NBC anchorman Brian Williams had with his work in Iraq.
On Sunday, O'Reilly and Engberg squared off on dueling 11 a.m. media shows. Here's video of O'Reilly blasting Engberg on Fox News' "Media Buzz."
And here's the transcript below of Engberg challenging O'Reilly on CNN's "Reliable Sources."
Here's a key passage.
In a 2009 interview on Hampton's TV, O'Reilly said he was the only CBS correspondent covering a demonstration on the streets of Buenos Aires. He said the other CBS staffers, which included Engberg and Bob Schieffer, were "hiding in the hotel."
What he just said was a fabrication, a lie. There were five CBS correspondents, including him, assigned to the bureau. ...Read more
(UPDATES AT END WITH FOX STATEMENT ON ENGBERG AND O'REILLY APPEARANCE ON MEDIA BUZZ SUNDAY.)
Fox News host Bill O'Reilly has been denouncing a "Mother Jones" story questioning his combat reporting during the Falklands conflict in 1982 as a partisan "hit piece" since it was published Thursday.
Friday night, he attacked the story again on his show calling one of the authors, David Corn, a "liar," as he asserted that everything he's said about his reportorial career is true.
But Saturday, Eric Engberg, a retired CBS News correspondent who was in Argentina with O'Reilly in 1982 also covering the story for the network, posted his version of events on Facebook and they are decidely at odds on several points with O'Reilly.
Typical of Engberg's thrust is this passage challenging O'Reilly calling the area of coverage in Buenos Aires a "war zone": "It was not a war zone or even close. It was an expense account zone."
Furthermore, Engberg's words paint O'Reilly as a grandstanding, novice reporter...Read more
Be prepared. In the first three minutes of "House of Cards" Season 3, Frank Underwood will do something that will shock you, no matter how cynical and jaded you might think you are about political leaders.
That he is now president of the United States made it all the more shocking to me — although I thought I was pretty cynical and jaded about media and politics. And it is only prelude to something he does in Episode 4 that is likely to truly appall some of the more religious members of the viewing audience.
I didn't think Frank's change in status would make all that much difference in how I reacted to his bad behavior. But after seeing the first six episodes and being shocked to the point of sounding verbal exclamations that brought my wife from the next room asking if I was OK, I think his new status does matter in serious ways.
I believe it says something significant about media, image and the way we have come to think about our presidents today. It is one of the harshest depictions...Read more