"IN THESE matters the only certainty is that nothing is certain," said the Roman philosopher Pliny The Elder.
Though one might suppose Pliny was certain he'd escape the devastation of the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 A.D., he did not. His nephew, Pliny the Younger, escaped. He had a better rowing arm.
SPEAKING OF certainties, the more I hear that the brilliant Cate Blanchett has a "lock" on the Oscar for best actress in "Blue Jasmine," the more I wonder who the surprise winner is going to be this coming Sunday?
Do not discount Dame Judi Dench for "Philomena" (great sentiment there, and much-loved for her years as M in the 007 films.) Or Amy Adams. Hers was a terrific turn in "American Hustle," and this is her fifth nomination. (She's been nominated five times for a Golden Globe, too.)
These actresses are Cate Blanchett's big competition. Meryl Streep was enjoyably over-the-top in "August: Osage County" but I wonder how seriously her performance has been taken. The movie itself has not been taken too seriously. (One critic, who enjoyed it for what it was, referred to the Streep/Julia Roberts effort as a "massive thesp-a-thon!")
And as admired as it was upon first viewing, the heat seems off Sandra Bullock's floating-in-space heroine from "Gravity." She doesn't have a lot to do in it.
INTERESTING SUGGESTION from one Jay Springer. He reminds us that Alec Baldwin was once touted to star in a biopic on Halston, the late great designer. I think that project has gone with the wind. But how about this? TV's sexy Sherlock Holmes, Benedict Cumberbatch as Halston?
Halston was probably more traditionally handsome, but Mr. Cumberbatch is: "Tall, dark, linear and has piercing, yet sad blue eyes. Halston would be most pleased!"
Maybe. As much as I admire Alec Baldwin, I never could see him as Halston -- too rough-hewn and hefty (even though he's trimmer than he was) and not young enough to play Halston.
Jude Law has also been mentioned, and that makes some aesthetic sense but he'd still have to portray Halston in his later years. Time stands still for no beauty, male or female.
I WAS intrigued by the trailer for Liam Neeson's upcoming movie, "Non-Stop," about a mad killer on a plane. (Liam is the only one who can save the day, natch.) But I saw part of a review -- I wouldn't read it all -- and "Non-Stop" was described as "ridiculously entertaining." That's enough for me. I'm getting on board and strapping myself in. I love to be entertained, ridiculously. (At this point in my life, taking things like movies or TV shows too seriously, is a real waste of time.)
P.S. Liam was on "60 Minutes" last Sunday night. He is so truthfully "real."
OK, I've been longing to say it, but if anybody gets killed off on "Downton Abbey" in Season five, I vote for the brooding Bates, now suspected as the killer of his wife's rapist. (Lady Mary loyally destroyed what might have been evidence against Bates.) Bates has become increasingly creepy as the series has gone on. I can't fathom why Lord Grantham trusts him so; Bates has a serious serial killer vibe.
The Season four finale was fine otherwise, ending with a beach party and loose ends aplenty. Who, if anybody will Lady Mary marry? ... Will Rose's next suitor be a Chinese warlord? ... Edith and the eternal plight of the unwed mother ... romance for no-nonsense Isobel? ... The rack and thumbscrews for Barrow? And, of course, the series' lynchpin, Violet, the Countess of Grantham.
Laughed out loud when Isobel said to Violet: "Why must you always sound like the sister of Marie Antoinette?"
After a tiny pause, Violet retorted: "The Queen of Naples was a stalwart figure, I consider that a compliment."
Isobel: "You consider everything a compliment."
Shirley MacLaine made a return appearance as Lady Grantham's mother, and had one good scene of reprimand aimed at Violet. But she simply doesn't have the proper rhythm for the show and she's been mostly let down by the writers. Too modern and too recognizable perhaps?
And please, those of you who complain about "historical accuracy" in the manner of how the household interacts, if a show like this was realistic, we'd loathe every upstairs member of the manor and be bored by the servants. It's just a TV show.
SO, I have looked at "Looking," the new HBO half-hour series about a group of gay friends in San Francisco. While it is a better representation of gay men than "Will & Grace" or "Queer as Folk," the show perhaps needs a full hour to flesh out the characters. But what struck me is the copious amount of facial hair on the guys. The show is set in 2014, but most everybody looks like they just jumped off the ferry from Fire Island in 1980 and are ready for a chorus of "YMCA."
Have I not been keeping up? Is the "clone" look back. Everything does make a comeback, so why not that? (I don't mean to scare you, but sooner or later, those shoulder-padded power suits worn by the likes of Joan Collins on "Dynasty" will return. You've been warned.)
(E-mail Liz Smith at MES3838@aol.com.)
(c)2014 TRIBUNE CONTENT AGENCY, LLC.
Will Cate Blanchett's performance in 'Blue Jasmine' grow into an Oscar?
We've upgraded our reader commenting system. Learn more about the new features.
The Baltimore Sun encourages civil dialogue related to our stories; you must register and log-in to our site in order to participate. We reserve the right to remove any user and to delete comments that violate our Terms of Service. By commenting, you agree to these terms. Please flag inappropriate comments.