Lazarus: Patients' choices narrower, yet cost of insurance rises

Health insurers can dictate where drugs can be bought if patients want a network discount. Sadly, this lack of choice may be the price we must pay in our for-profit system.

  • Share
Anthem

The Anthem Blue Cross headquarters in Woodland Hills. (David McNew / Getty Images / September 11, 2012)

It's hard enough having a serious condition like cancer or kidney failure. It's even worse, some might think, when your health insurer says you have to buy your medicine from the pharmacy of its choice — or pay the full amount for expensive life-saving drugs elsewhere.

Yet that's precisely what Anthem Blue Cross is telling people who require so-called specialty medicines, which are used for complex conditions and can cost thousands of dollars a month.

As of Jan. 1, the insurer says, such people can either buy their drugs from the mail-order pharmacy CuraScript or pay full fare at a retail drugstore.

"Using a retail pharmacy will be considered going out-of-network," Anthem says in a letter being sent to many users of specialty meds. "And your plan doesn't have coverage for that. So you'll have to pay the full price of the drug."

Jacques Liberman, 57, of Cathedral City received one of the letters the other day. He is HIV-positive and takes a drug called Atripla to help prevent his condition from transforming into full-blown AIDS.

Atripla, jointly made by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Gilead, isn't cheap. It costs about $60 per pill and has to be taken every day. That's at least $1,800 a month.

In Liberman's case, Anthem covers part of his prescription-drug costs. After that, he relies on an AIDS Drugs Assistance Program funded by state and federal dollars.

Quiz: Test your healthcare knowledge

What Liberman resents most is the loss of personal freedom.

"Who is Anthem to tell me where I have to buy my medicine?" he said. "Why should I have to buy it from some mail-order company instead of the drugstore that I have been going to for a long time?"

These are fair questions. The answers, however, are complicated and cut to the heart of our country's healthcare system.

Put simply, the practice of an insurer dictating terms to patients is the price we pay for an employer-based insurance system under which for-profit companies negotiate terms to keep costs down.

If that denies consumers the ability to choose where and when they'll shop or to know the actual price of medical treatment, tough patooties.

"I'd love a more transparent healthcare market," said Craig E. Thompson, executive director of the AIDS Project Los Angeles, a nonprofit group that advocates on behalf of people with HIV/AIDS. "I'd love to know how much healthcare actually costs.

"But as long as I'm OK with having an insurance plan from my employer, I have to be OK with that insurance company telling my employer that I have to buy specialty drugs from a mail-order pharmacy."

Thompson also is HIV-positive, and as an Anthem customer, he too faces the prospect of having to buy his meds from CuraScript as of the first of the year. But he feels none of Liberman's outrage.

Insurers and employers have to do whatever they can to keep medical costs down, Thompson said. Otherwise we'd see even higher premiums, co-pays and deductibles.

He also believes that mail-order pharmacies with experience in specialty drugs are best-suited to handle such prescriptions.

"These medications are fairly complicated," Thompson said. "I'm not sure every pharmacy should be dispensing these drugs."

It sounds as if he's making the best of a bad situation. I asked Thompson which he'd prefer if he had a choice: our current employer-based insurance system or a single-payer, Medicare-for-all system.

  • Share
 

BUSINESS VIDEOS

PHOTO GALLERIES