|
The Body Armour logo is left and the Under Armour one is on the right. (July 13, 2012) |
![Athletes with Under Armour endorsements [Pictures]](http://www.baltimoresun.com/media/thumbnails/photogallery/2012-01/57452896-26075851.jpg "Athletes with Under Armour endorsements [Pictures]")
![Kevin Plank through the years [Pictures]](http://www.baltimoresun.com/media/thumbnails/photogallery/2012-03/68908870-19120258.jpg "Kevin Plank through the years [Pictures]")
A Beverly Hills sports drink maker being sued by Baltimore-based Under Armour Inc. says the trademark infringement lawsuit is without merit, according to court documents filed Thursday.
The lawsuit filed April 26 in U.S. District Court in Baltimore says drink maker Body Armor Nutrition LLC uses a brand name and logo that confuses consumers. The complaint seeks an injunction banning the California company from using the name Body Armor and a logo and tagline that Under Armour says is similar to its own.
Body Armor's court filing says it would be nearly impossible for consumers to confuse brands that sell unrelated products. In a statement, Body Armor executives called the lawsuit a "ridiculous" attack on a start-up company in the beverage industry.
Lorraine.mirabella@baltsun.
Text BUSINESS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun Business text alerts
The lawsuit filed April 26 in U.S. District Court in Baltimore says drink maker Body Armor Nutrition LLC uses a brand name and logo that confuses consumers. The complaint seeks an injunction banning the California company from using the name Body Armor and a logo and tagline that Under Armour says is similar to its own.
Body Armor's court filing says it would be nearly impossible for consumers to confuse brands that sell unrelated products. In a statement, Body Armor executives called the lawsuit a "ridiculous" attack on a start-up company in the beverage industry.
Lorraine.mirabella@baltsun.
Text BUSINESS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun Business text alerts
